[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140709164018.GF5254@pd.tnic>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 18:40:18 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Petr Mládek <pmladek@...e.cz>
Cc: Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
ak@...ux.intel.com, bp@...e.de, jack@...e.cz,
john.stultz@...aro.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] printk: use a clever macro
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 06:32:05PM +0200, Petr Mládek wrote:
> I know that it sets 1 now. I wondered about possible future changes.
> Well, it is probably too paranoid. Anyway, any non-zero value is fine.
Yes, because they both are used only in a boolean context.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists