linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] drivers/base/dma-buf.c: replace dma_buf_uninit_debugfs by debugfs_remove

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140710003428.GA22113@kroah.com>
Date:	Wed, 9 Jul 2014 17:34:28 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
	linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] drivers/base/dma-buf.c: replace
 dma_buf_uninit_debugfs by debugfs_remove_recursive

On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 10:32:10PM +0200, Fabian Frederick wrote:
> null test before debugfs_remove_recursive is not needed so one line function
> dma_buf_uninit_debugfs can be removed.
> 
> This patch calls debugfs_remove_recursive under CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
> 
> Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>
> ---
> 
> This is untested.
> 
>  drivers/base/dma-buf.c | 13 +++----------
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/base/dma-buf.c b/drivers/base/dma-buf.c
> index 840c7fa..184c0cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/dma-buf.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/dma-buf.c
> @@ -701,12 +701,6 @@ static int dma_buf_init_debugfs(void)
>  	return err;
>  }
>  
> -static void dma_buf_uninit_debugfs(void)
> -{
> -	if (dma_buf_debugfs_dir)
> -		debugfs_remove_recursive(dma_buf_debugfs_dir);
> -}
> -
>  int dma_buf_debugfs_create_file(const char *name,
>  				int (*write)(struct seq_file *))
>  {
> @@ -722,9 +716,6 @@ static inline int dma_buf_init_debugfs(void)
>  {
>  	return 0;
>  }
> -static inline void dma_buf_uninit_debugfs(void)
> -{
> -}
>  #endif
>  
>  static int __init dma_buf_init(void)
> @@ -738,6 +729,8 @@ subsys_initcall(dma_buf_init);
>  
>  static void __exit dma_buf_deinit(void)
>  {
> -	dma_buf_uninit_debugfs();
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
> +	debugfs_remove_recursive(dma_buf_debugfs_dir);
> +#endif

That ifdef should not be needed at all, right?  No ifdefs should be
needed for debugfs code, if it is written correctly :)

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/