lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 10 Jul 2014 17:41:50 +0900
From:	Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
To:	<tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <hpa@...or.com>
CC:	<x86@...nel.org>, <toshi.kani@...com>, <imammedo@...hat.com>,
	<bp@...en8.de>, <huawei.libin@...wei.com>,
	<paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>,
	<peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: [PATCH] x86,cpu-hotplug: assign same CPU number to readded CPU

llc_shared_map is not cleared even if CPU is offline or hot removed.
So when hot-plugging CPU and assigning new CPU number to hot-added CPU,
the mask has wrong value. The mask is used by CSF schduler to create
sched_domain. So it breaks CFS scheduler.

Here is a example on my system.
My system has 4 sockets and each socket has 15 cores and HT is enabled.
In this case, each core of sockes is numbered as follows:

          | CPU#
Socket#0 | 0-14 , 60-74
Socket#1 | 15-29, 75-89
Socket#2 | 30-44, 90-104
Socket#3 | 45-59, 105-119

Then llc_shared_mask of CPU#30 has 0x3fff80000001fffc0000000.
It means that last level cache of Socket#2 is shared with
CPU#30-44 and 90-104.

When hot-removing socket#2 and #3, each core of sockets is numbered
as follows:

          | CPU#
Socket#0 | 0-14 , 60-74
Socket#1 | 15-29, 75-89

But llc_shared_mask is not cleared. So llc_shared_mask of CPU#30 remains
having 0x3fff80000001fffc0000000.

After that, when hot-adding socket#2 and #3, each core of sockets is
numbered as follows:

          | CPU#
Socket#0 | 0-14 , 60-74
Socket#1 | 15-29, 75-89
Socket#2 | 30-59
Socket#3 | 90-119

Then llc_shared_mask of CPU#30 becomes 0x3fff8000fffffffc0000000.
It means that last level cache of Socket#2 is shared with CPU#30-59
and 90-104. So the mask has wrong value.

At first, I cleared hot-removed CPU number's bit from llc_shared_map
when hot removing CPU. But Borislav suggested that the problem will
disappear if readded CPU is assigned same CPU number. And llc_shared_map
must not be changed.

So the patch assigns same CPU number to readded CPU by linking CPU
number to APIC ID. And by the patch, the problem disappers.

Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
Suggested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de1>
---
  arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
index ad28db7..1cc715b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
@@ -220,6 +220,22 @@ static void apic_pm_activate(void);
  static unsigned long apic_phys;

  /*
+ * Bind ACPI ID to CPU ID
+ * CPU ID to APIC ID does not change by this array even if CPU is
+ * hotplugged. So don't clear the array even if CPU is hot-removed
+ */
+static int apicid_to_cpuid[MAX_LOCAL_APIC] = {
+	[0 ... MAX_LOCAL_APIC-1] = -1,
+};
+
+/*
+ * Represent CPU ID bound to APIC
+ * Don't clear a bit even if CPU is hot-removed
+ */
+static DECLARE_BITMAP(cpu_used_bits, CONFIG_NR_CPUS);
+static struct cpumask *const cpu_used_mask = to_cpumask(cpu_used_bits);
+
+/*
   * Get the LAPIC version
   */
  static inline int lapic_get_version(void)
@@ -2122,6 +2138,17 @@ void disconnect_bsp_APIC(int virt_wire_setup)
  	apic_write(APIC_LVT1, value);
  }

+static int get_cpuid(int apicid)
+{
+	int cpuid;
+
+	cpuid = apicid_to_cpuid[apicid];
+	if (cpuid < 0)
+		cpuid = cpumask_next_zero(-1, cpu_used_mask);
+
+	return cpuid;
+}
+
  int generic_processor_info(int apicid, int version)
  {
  	int cpu, max = nr_cpu_ids;
@@ -2199,7 +2226,9 @@ int generic_processor_info(int apicid, int version)
  		 */
  		cpu = 0;
  	} else
-		cpu = cpumask_next_zero(-1, cpu_present_mask);
+		cpu = get_cpuid(apicid);
+
+	apicid_to_cpuid[apicid] = cpu;

  	/*
  	 * Validate version
@@ -2228,6 +2257,7 @@ int generic_processor_info(int apicid, int version)
  	early_per_cpu(x86_cpu_to_logical_apicid, cpu) =
  		apic->x86_32_early_logical_apicid(cpu);
  #endif
+	cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpu_used_mask);
  	set_cpu_possible(cpu, true);
  	set_cpu_present(cpu, true);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists