[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87pphdh85q.fsf@nemi.mork.no>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 11:31:29 +0200
From: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
To: Tom Gundersen <teg@...m.no>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>,
Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>,
dingtianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>,
Tan Xiaojun <tanxiaojun@...wei.com>,
WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 10/33] net: dummy - set name assign type
Tom Gundersen <teg@...m.no> writes:
> A fixed number of indistinguishable dummy devices are allocated at module init time,
> the names are therefore PREDICTABLE rather than ENUM.
OK? So if I go do
modprobe dummy numdummies=2
ip link add type dummy
ip link add type dummy
then I'd have dummy0 and dummy1 with NET_NAME_PREDICTABLE, but dummy2 and
dummy3 with NET_NAME_ENUM (from your rtnetlink patch).
I think this just demonstrates that there aren't that many different
name types. There is no real difference between your NET_NAME_ENUM and
NET_NAME_PREDICTABLE, resulting in arbitrary choices like this one.
The same goes for NET_NAME_USER and NET_NAME_RENAMED. These are the same
from a kernel point of view. If userspace wants to keep track of device
name history then it is free to do so without any need for a RENAMED
type.
Bjørn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists