[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140710093900.GV3935@laptop>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 11:39:00 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...nel.org, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
dvhart@...ux.intel.com, fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com,
sbw@....edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/3] rcu: Add designated reviewers for RCU
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 06:23:22AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > SCHEDULER:
> > ...
> > R: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> (kernel/sched/rt.c)
> > R: Juri Lelli <jundri.lelli@...il.com> (kernel/sched/deadline.c)
>
> Maybe a better syntax might be something like:
> R: Steven Rostedt
> F: kernel/sched/rt.c
>
> where optional F:/X: lines override the default
> assumption of all F:/X: from the section.
Would RF: make sense? Instead of the indenting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists