linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] spi: Add support for Zynq QSPI controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFcVEC+-bM91WmfwweDdTvJ7KwH+dxKDLkzsT82snWKhukLeYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 10 Jul 2014 16:03:19 +0530
From:	Harini Katakam <harinikatakamlinux@...il.com>
To:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
	Marek Vašut <marex@...x.de>,
	Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@...ux.intel.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>,
	Sourav Poddar <sourav.poddar@...com>,
	"michals@...inx.com" <michals@...inx.com>,
	Punnaiah Choudary Kalluri <punnaia@...inx.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] spi: Add support for Zynq QSPI controller

Hi Geert,

On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> Hi Harini,
>
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Harini Katakam
> <harinikatakamlinux@...il.com> wrote:
>>>> +       master->mode_bits = SPI_CPOL | SPI_CPHA | SPI_RX_DUAL | SPI_RX_QUAD |
>>>> +                           SPI_TX_DUAL | SPI_TX_QUAD;
>>>
>>> Your driver advertises Dual/Quad SPI Transfer capabilities, but it doesn't
>>> check spi_transfer.[tr]x_nbits? How can it determine when to enable Dual/Quad?
>>
>> Here the driver is just giving information that the controller support it.
>> The MTD layer enables dual/quad based on what the flash supports; quad
>> being the first priority
>> I understand that the spi core reads rx, tx-bus-width property and
>> master support flags and
>> performs the necessary checks.
>
> That's correct: as long as the rx, tx-bus-width  properties do not indicate a
> Dual or Quad wiring, it won't be used.
>
> However, based on schematics, someone may set the rx, tx-bus-width properties
> to 4, which is correct, as DT describes the hardware. But this will fail to
> work.
> So I think it's safer not to announce Dual/Quad support in the driver until
> the actual driver support is there.
>

OK. Correct me if I'm wrong but announcing this support in master->flags is
just to say the controller supports it - Like Punnaiah mentioned in the other
mail, nothing specific needs to be done from the controller driver to enable
dual/quad support. This is at the SOC/IP level.
I agree it might or might not be supported at board-level.
But that's based on the user's hardware. Should master->flags
really take this into consideration?

BTW, I dint see master->mode_bits being used anywhere at the moment.

Regards,
Harini
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/