lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 10 Jul 2014 15:29:33 +0200
From:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] [RFC] spi: core: Pass correct device to dma_map_sg()

From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>

According to Documentation/dmaengine.txt, scatterlists must be mapped
using the DMA struct device.

However, "dma_chan.dev->device" is the sysfs class device's device.
Use "dma_chan.device->dev" instead, which is the real DMA device's device.

Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
---
It seems very few drivers pass the right device.  Most drivers pass the
platform device's device, cfr. Documentation/DMA-API-HOWTO.txt, which
suggests to use "&my_dev->dev".

Question: If dma_map_*() is called with the DMA struct device, I assume
          dma_sync_() should also be called with the same DMA struct
	  device?
---
 drivers/spi/spi.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi.c b/drivers/spi/spi.c
index 3aac0e885cd9..eef58cec2210 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi.c
@@ -647,8 +647,8 @@ static int __spi_map_msg(struct spi_master *master, struct spi_message *msg)
 	if (!master->can_dma)
 		return 0;
 
-	tx_dev = &master->dma_tx->dev->device;
-	rx_dev = &master->dma_rx->dev->device;
+	tx_dev = master->dma_tx->device->dev;
+	rx_dev = master->dma_rx->device->dev;
 
 	list_for_each_entry(xfer, &msg->transfers, transfer_list) {
 		if (!master->can_dma(master, msg->spi, xfer))
@@ -687,8 +687,8 @@ static int spi_unmap_msg(struct spi_master *master, struct spi_message *msg)
 	if (!master->cur_msg_mapped || !master->can_dma)
 		return 0;
 
-	tx_dev = &master->dma_tx->dev->device;
-	rx_dev = &master->dma_rx->dev->device;
+	tx_dev = master->dma_tx->device->dev;
+	rx_dev = master->dma_rx->device->dev;
 
 	list_for_each_entry(xfer, &msg->transfers, transfer_list) {
 		if (!master->can_dma(master, msg->spi, xfer))
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists