[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140710135124.GB32462@kwain>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 15:51:24 +0200
From: Antoine Ténart
<antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com>
To: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
Cc: Antoine Ténart
<antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
Peter.Chen@...escale.com, kishon@...com, stern@...land.harvard.edu,
alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com,
thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com, zmxu@...vell.com,
jszhang@...vell.com, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] usb: chipidea: add support to the PHY framework for
ChipIdea
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 08:42:27AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 12:17:16PM +0200, Antoine Ténart wrote:
> > This patch adds the support to the PHY framework for ChipIdea drivers
> > while keeping the USB PHY compatibility. Changes are done in both the
> > ChipIdea common code and in the drivers accessing the PHY. This is done
> > by renaming 'phy' into 'usb_phy' and adding a new 'phy' member into the
> > ci_hdrc structre.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Antoine Ténart <antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/usb/chipidea/ci.h | 4 ++-
> > drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_imx.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_msm.c | 6 ++--
> > drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > drivers/usb/chipidea/debug.c | 4 ++-
> > drivers/usb/chipidea/host.c | 17 ++++++----
> > drivers/usb/chipidea/otg_fsm.c | 6 ++--
> > drivers/usb/chipidea/udc.c | 4 +--
> > include/linux/usb/chipidea.h | 4 ++-
> > 9 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci.h b/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci.h
> > index 9563cb56d564..139589c8ab90 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci.h
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci.h
> > @@ -201,7 +201,9 @@ struct ci_hdrc {
> >
> > struct ci_hdrc_platform_data *platdata;
> > int vbus_active;
> > - struct usb_phy *transceiver;
> > + struct phy *transceiver;
> > + /* old usb_phy interface */
> > + struct usb_phy *usb_transceiver;
>
> while at that, do you mind calling all struct usb_phy pointers
> 'usb_phy' ?
Not at all.
With s/usb_transceiver/usb_phy/, what about 'transceiver'?
Antoine
--
Antoine Ténart, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists