[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53BE9AB1.6090603@kernel.dk>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 15:52:49 +0200
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>
CC: "Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)" <Elliott@...com>,
"dgilbert@...erlog.com" <dgilbert@...erlog.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@...ionio.com>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: scsi-mq V2
On 2014-07-10 15:50, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 09:36:09AM -0400, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
>> There is one possible concern that could be exacerbated by other changes in
>> the system: if the application is running close to the bare minimum number
>> of requests allocated in io_setup(), the per cpu reference counters will
>> have a hard time batching things. It might be worth testing with an
>> increased number of requests being allocated if this is the case.
>
> Well, Robert said reverting the two aio commits didn't help. Either he
> didn't manage to boot into the right kernel, or we need to look
> elsewhere for the culprit.
Rob, let me know what scsi_debug setup you use, and I can try and
reproduce it here as well.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists