[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <94D0CD8314A33A4D9D801C0FE68B402958B96E3B@G9W0745.americas.hpqcorp.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 15:51:44 +0000
From: "Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)" <Elliott@...com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
CC: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"dgilbert@...erlog.com" <dgilbert@...erlog.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@...ionio.com>,
Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: scsi-mq V2
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christoph Hellwig [mailto:hch@...radead.org]
> Sent: Thursday, 10 July, 2014 1:21 AM
> To: Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)
> Cc: Jens Axboe; dgilbert@...erlog.com; Christoph Hellwig; James Bottomley;
> Bart Van Assche; Benjamin LaHaise; linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: scsi-mq V2
>
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 12:53:36AM +0000, Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)
> wrote:
> > the problem still occurs - fio results in low or 0 IOPS, with perf top
> > reporting unusual amounts of time spent in do_io_submit and io_submit.
>
> The diff between the two version doesn't show too much other possible
> interesting commits, the most interesting being some minor block
> updates.
>
> I guess we'll have to a manual bisect, I've pushed out a
> scsi-mq.3-bisect-1 branch that is rebased to just before the merge of
> the block tree
good.
> and a scsi-mq.3-bisect-2 branch that is just after the merge of the
> block tree to get started.
good.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists