linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drivers: tty: Remove redundant memset() in initialize_tty

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <53BEBDB7.9080302@suse.cz>
Date:	Thu, 10 Jul 2014 18:22:15 +0200
From:	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To:	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: tty: Remove redundant memset() in initialize_tty_struct

On 07/10/2014 06:16 PM, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> All callers (all two) of initialize_tty_struct() have just obtained
> the passed tty_struct from alloc_tty_struct(), which uses
> kzalloc(). So there is no reason to clear the memory again.

Actually I don't see a reason to have initialize_tty_struct as a
separate function. In both cases it is called after alloc_tty_struct. So
it would make sense to move the initialization to alloc_tty_struct. (And
move try_module_get before alloc_tty_struct in pty_common_install.)

Could you do that?

-- 
js
suse labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/