[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53BEEE38.8030407@tilera.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 15:49:12 -0400
From: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/17] tile: Remove tile-specific _sinitdata and _einitdata
On 7/9/2014 2:33 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com> wrote:
>> On 11/14/2013 3:31 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> Feel free to take v2 below. Thanks!
>>>
>>> From d761d4d63945ff0a6eab5a9058c132f870c92aff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
>>> Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 21:33:29 +0100
>>> Subject: [PATCH -v2] tile: Remove tile-specific _sinitdata and _einitdata
>>>
>>> Use standard __init_begin and __init_end instead.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
>>> Acked-by: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>
>> Taken into the tile tree; thanks! (I did fix one extra place where it mentioned _sinitdata in a comment.)
> I'm going through old patches, and it seems this is still not upstream?
Yes, and I'm not at all sure what happened. There were a couple of mistakes
in the original post (einittext converted instead of einitdata), and maybe I
ended up dropping it entirely instead of taking v2.
In any case it's now in the tile tree and upstreamed to linux-tile so you
should see it in linux-next shortly.
Sorry!
--
Chris Metcalf, Tilera Corp.
http://www.tilera.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists