linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 4/8] Drivers: scsi: storvsc: Filter WRITE_SAME

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 10 Jul 2014 21:02:40 +0000
From:	KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
To:	James Bottomley <jbottomley@...allels.com>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"mkp@....net" <mkp@....net>,
	"hch@...radead.org" <hch@...radead.org>,
	"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
	"apw@...onical.com" <apw@...onical.com>,
	"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"ohering@...e.com" <ohering@...e.com>,
	"jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 4/8] Drivers: scsi: storvsc: Filter WRITE_SAME_16



> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Bottomley [mailto:jbottomley@...allels.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 9, 2014 3:27 PM
> To: KY Srinivasan
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; mkp@....net; hch@...radead.org;
> devel@...uxdriverproject.org; apw@...onical.com; stable@...r.kernel.org;
> linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org; ohering@...e.com; jasowang@...hat.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] Drivers: scsi: storvsc: Filter WRITE_SAME_16
> 
> On Wed, 2014-07-09 at 21:14 +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: James Bottomley [mailto:jbottomley@...allels.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 9, 2014 12:57 PM
> > > To: KY Srinivasan
> > > Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; hch@...radead.org;
> > > devel@...uxdriverproject.org; apw@...onical.com;
> > > stable@...r.kernel.org; linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org;
> > > ohering@...e.com; jasowang@...hat.com
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] Drivers: scsi: storvsc: Filter
> > > WRITE_SAME_16
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2014-07-09 at 19:52 +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Christoph Hellwig [mailto:hch@...radead.org]
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 9, 2014 1:43 AM
> > > > > To: KY Srinivasan
> > > > > Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; devel@...uxdriverproject.org;
> > > > > ohering@...e.com; jbottomley@...allels.com;
> jasowang@...hat.com;
> > > > > apw@...onical.com; linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org;
> > > > > stable@...r.kernel.org
> > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] Drivers: scsi: storvsc: Filter
> > > > > WRITE_SAME_16
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 05:46:48PM -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
> > > > > > Host does not handle WRITE_SAME_16; filter this command out.
> > > > > > This patch is required to handle large devices (greater than 2 TB
> disks).
> > > > >
> > > > > Storvsc already sets the no_write_same flag, where is the
> > > > > command coming from?
> > > >
> > > > In spite of this flag,  I see WRITE_SAME_16 being issued when I
> > > > format a device bigger than 2 TB; I tried both xfs and ext4.
> > > > Windows hosts currently do not handle unsupported commands
> > > > correctly - The information returned is not sufficient to effect recovery
> in the Linux guest.
> > > While this may be addressed in future hosts, this patch fixes the problem.
> > >
> > > What Christoph means is that this looks like a bug somewhere in SCSI
> itself.
> > > That means we need to find it and kill it, not add workarounds to
> > > every driver that sets no_write_same ...
> >
> > James,
> >
> > I will try to isolate this issue in the SCSI stack. If it is ok with
> > you guys, I would still want to filter WRITE_SAME_16 (as we currently
> > do WRITE_SAME) in our driver since this would address the problem for a
> large number of customers on our platform.
> 
> If we fix it at source, why would there be any need to filter?  That's the
> reason the no_write_same flag was introduced.  If we can find and fix the
> bug, it can go back into the stable trees as a bug fix, hence nothing should
> ever emit write_same(10 or 16) and additional driver code is redundant (and
> counter productive, since if this ever breaks again you're our best canary).
> 
> This looks like it might be the problem but Martin should confirm (I think the
> problem comes to us from the RC16 code which unconditionally sets WS16).
> 
> James

James,

This patch works for me; are you planning on committing this patch.

Regards,

K. Y
> 
> ---
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c index 6825eda..8353a4c
> 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> @@ -634,6 +634,23 @@ static void sd_config_discard(struct scsi_disk *sdkp,
> unsigned int mode)
>  		max(sdkp->physical_block_size,
>  		    sdkp->unmap_granularity * logical_block_size);
> 
> +	if (sdkp->device->host->no_write_same) {
> +		switch(mode) {
> +
> +		case SD_LBP_WS16:
> +		case SD_LBP_WS10:
> +		case SD_LBP_ZERO:
> +			/*
> +			 * filter out all the WRITE SAME modes and map them
> +			 * directly to UNMAP
> +			 */
> +			mode = SD_LBP_UNMAP;
> +			/* fall through */
> +		default:
> +			/* everything else is OK */
> +			break;
> +		}
> +	}
>  	sdkp->provisioning_mode = mode;
> 
>  	switch (mode) {

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/