[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20385712.vl9ZPHu7Ll@indiana>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 23:48:01 +0200
From: Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda <leo@...xarxa.net>
To: linux-parport@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: "Matwey V. Kornilov" <matwey@....msu.ru>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Heiko Andreas Sommer <hsommer@....org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Linux-parport] [PATCHv3 2/2] Add force_epp module option for parport_pc.
Hi,
this thread has been very interesting. I feel that I'm one of the
"instigators" to solve this f... bug in the kernel. But, it seems that it's
quiet difficult, more because the kernel developers than the bug itself.
But well, to be honest, the kernel developers do a great and complex job, so
probably they have good reasons to react in that way. Think that it's the
second time that a patch to solve this bug is rejected.
Thanks Matwey for the patch and the afford to solve this bug. I have several
boxes in the lab where I work (Dell 745) that suffer that false positives.
Also, there's some pci card that also suffer that. I think that we have one.
But, I'm not sure.
So, I can check whatever could be necessary.
Best regards,
Leopold
--
--
Linux User 152692 PGP: 05F4A7A949A2D9AA
Catalonia
-------------------------------------
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists