[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53BF81CE.60507@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 11:48:54 +0530
From: Tushar Behera <trblinux@...il.com>
To: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Tushar Behera <tushar.b@...sung.com>
CC: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
ML Devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...gle.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Shaik Ameer Basha <shaik.ameer@...sung.com>,
ML Arch-Arm <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] clk: exynos-audss: Keep the parent of mout_audss
always enabled
On 06/13/2014 02:39 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Tushar Behera (2014-06-12 00:29:23)
>> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 10:20 PM, Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org> wrote:
>>> Quoting Tushar Behera (2014-06-10 22:32:17)
>>>> When the output clock of AUDSS mux is disabled, we are getting kernel
>>>> oops while doing a clk_get() on other clocks provided by AUDSS. Though
>>>> user manual doesn't specify this dependency, we came across this issue
>>>> while disabling the parent of AUDSS mux clocks.
>>>
>>> Hi Tushar,
>>>
>>> Can you help me understand better what the actual problem is? What is
>>> the root cause of the kernel oops?
>>
>> Currently AUDSS mux has two parents, XXTI crystal and MAU_EPLL clock.
>> As per observation, when the output of AUDSS mux is gated, we are not
>> able to do any operation on the clocks provided by MAU block (mostly
>> the clocks used by ADMA and audio blocks).
>
> I tried to get a datasheet for Exynos 54xx but could not find it. I even
> looked at the public 5250 data sheet, but it is completely missing
> Chapter 34, "Audio Subsystem", which apparently contains Figure 34-3,
> "Clock names and clock tree diagram of MAUDIO_BLK".
>
> So without any clue about your hardware (not for lack of trying) I would
> guess that somewhere in the parent hierarchy you have an interface clock
> which must be enabled in order for you to touch the registers pertaining
> to the downstream audio clocks.
>
Yes, right. As per observation, we need to keep the output of AUDSS mux
enabled to access the registers present in MAU block.
> The right way to handle this requires two steps:
>
> 1) model your interface clock in the Linux clock framework if you
> haven't already (I assume it is a gate clock, or the child of a gate
> clock)
>
The interface clock is already part of the clock framework.
> 2) the clk_ops callbacks for the affected audio clocks should wrap their
> operations (i.e. critical secion) with a clk_enable/clk_disable pair,
> where the clock being enables/disable is the interface clock mentioned
> above in #1
>
> The CCF is reentrant, so you can do this by simply using the top-level
> clk.h API from within your clk_ops callbacks.
>
Right now, the clocks are registered with clk_register_mux,
clk_register_div and clk_register_gate calls which in turn set
appropriate clk_ops callbacks. If I need to wrap the register access
during these clk_ops callbacks with clk_enable/clk_disable of interface
lock, I would have to reimplement the clk_ops callbacks in
clk-exynos-audss driver.
Is that the approach that you are suggesting?
> I might be totally wrong about the cause of the hang, but that's my best
> guess based on everyone's bug reports.
>
There are 5 gate clocks within MAU block. While disabling the unused
clocks, if CLK_MAU_EPLL is disabled first, then we are getting this
system hang.
> Regards,
> Mike
>
>>
>>>
>>> You mention calling clk_get on child clocks of the AUDSS mux fails, but
>>> I cannot imagine why. How can the enable/disable state of a clock affect
>>> the ability to clk_get other clocks?
>>>
>>
>> I might have a little vogue while updating the commit message
>> (mentioning about clk_get which surely is only a s/w operation), but
>> there is definitely some issue with handling those clocks under given
>> scenario.
>>
>> I am on leave till end of this week, so I will update you more with
>> the logs on Monday.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> --
>> Tushar
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
--
Tushar Behera
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists