linux-kernel - [RFC Patch V1 24/30] mm, x86/platform/uv: Use cpu_to_mem()/numa_mem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 11 Jul 2014 15:37:41 +0800
From:	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	cpw <cpw@....com>, Hedi Berriche <hedi@....com>,
	Mike Travis <travis@....com>,
	Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com>
Cc:	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-hotplug@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: [RFC Patch V1 24/30] mm, x86/platform/uv: Use cpu_to_mem()/numa_mem_id() to support memoryless node

When CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES is enabled, cpu_to_node()/numa_node_id()
may return a node without memory, and later cause system failure/panic
when calling kmalloc_node() and friends with returned node id.
So use cpu_to_mem()/numa_mem_id() instead to get the nearest node with
memory for the/current cpu.

If CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES is disabled, cpu_to_mem()/numa_mem_id()
is the same as cpu_to_node()/numa_node_id().

Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/platform/uv/tlb_uv.c  |    2 +-
 arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_nmi.c  |    3 ++-
 arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_time.c |    2 +-
 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/uv/tlb_uv.c b/arch/x86/platform/uv/tlb_uv.c
index dfe605ac1bcd..4612b4396004 100644
--- a/arch/x86/platform/uv/tlb_uv.c
+++ b/arch/x86/platform/uv/tlb_uv.c
@@ -2116,7 +2116,7 @@ static int __init uv_bau_init(void)
 
 	for_each_possible_cpu(cur_cpu) {
 		mask = &per_cpu(uv_flush_tlb_mask, cur_cpu);
-		zalloc_cpumask_var_node(mask, GFP_KERNEL, cpu_to_node(cur_cpu));
+		zalloc_cpumask_var_node(mask, GFP_KERNEL, cpu_to_mem(cur_cpu));
 	}
 
 	nuvhubs = uv_num_possible_blades();
diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_nmi.c b/arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_nmi.c
index c89c93320c12..d17758215a61 100644
--- a/arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_nmi.c
+++ b/arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_nmi.c
@@ -715,7 +715,8 @@ void uv_nmi_setup(void)
 		nid = cpu_to_node(cpu);
 		if (uv_hub_nmi_list[nid] == NULL) {
 			uv_hub_nmi_list[nid] = kzalloc_node(size,
-							    GFP_KERNEL, nid);
+							    GFP_KERNEL,
+							    cpu_to_mem(cpu));
 			BUG_ON(!uv_hub_nmi_list[nid]);
 			raw_spin_lock_init(&(uv_hub_nmi_list[nid]->nmi_lock));
 			atomic_set(&uv_hub_nmi_list[nid]->cpu_owner, -1);
diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_time.c b/arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_time.c
index 5c86786bbfd2..c369fb2eb7d3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_time.c
+++ b/arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_time.c
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ static __init int uv_rtc_allocate_timers(void)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	for_each_present_cpu(cpu) {
-		int nid = cpu_to_node(cpu);
+		int nid = cpu_to_mem(cpu);
 		int bid = uv_cpu_to_blade_id(cpu);
 		int bcpu = uv_cpu_hub_info(cpu)->blade_processor_id;
 		struct uv_rtc_timer_head *head = blade_info[bid];
-- 
1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/