linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: Get rid of __HAVE_ARCH

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMuHMdVNKD2DsmhrHGxyhGSQZX8MXFOHkr__jx-A9PWvrFCSpQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 11 Jul 2014 12:35:43 +0200
From:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Get rid of __HAVE_ARCH_CMPXCHG

On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 12:19:43PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> What about non-x86? __HAVE_ARCH_CMPXCHG isn't always defined.
>
> Bah, this hunk was definitely not supposed to be there. Thanks for the
> catch!

IC.

In that case you also want to add a (new) "#define __HAVE_ARCH_CMPXCHG 1"
to one of the shared x86 header files, right?

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/