[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53BFD26C.6080609@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 15:02:52 +0300
From: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
To: Rostislav Lisovy <lisovy@...il.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...prootsystems.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Pekon Gupta <pekon@...com>, Michal Vokac <vokac.m@...il.com>,
Michal Sojka <sojkam1@....cvut.cz>,
Rostislav Lisovy <lisovy@...ica.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: omap2+: gpmc-nand: Use dynamic platform_device_alloc()
On 07/09/2014 03:49 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
> Hi Rostislav,
>
> On 06/04/2014 05:24 PM, Rostislav Lisovy wrote:
>> GPMC controller supports up to 8 memory devices connected to it.
>> Since there is one statically allocated "struct platform_device
>> gpmc_nand_device" it is not possible to configure the system to
>> use more than one NAND device connected to the GPMC. This
>> modification makes it possible to use up to 8 NAND devices
>> connected to the GPMC controller.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rostislav Lisovy <lisovy@...ica.cz>
>> ---
>>
>> Tested on custom AM335x board with two different NAND chips
>> (128 + 256 MiB) using GPMC configuration in FDT -- behaves
>> correctly.
>>
>>
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-nand.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-nand.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-nand.c
>> index 4349e82..c5481a8 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-nand.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-nand.c
>> @@ -24,25 +24,6 @@
>> /* minimum size for IO mapping */
>> #define NAND_IO_SIZE 4
>>
>> -static struct resource gpmc_nand_resource[] = {
>> - {
>> - .flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
>> - },
>> - {
>> - .flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ,
>> - },
>> - {
>> - .flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ,
>> - },
>> -};
>> -
>> -static struct platform_device gpmc_nand_device = {
>> - .name = "omap2-nand",
>> - .id = 0,
>> - .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(gpmc_nand_resource),
>> - .resource = gpmc_nand_resource,
>> -};
>> -
>> static bool gpmc_hwecc_bch_capable(enum omap_ecc ecc_opt)
>> {
>> /* platforms which support all ECC schemes */
>> @@ -93,43 +74,41 @@ int gpmc_nand_init(struct omap_nand_platform_data *gpmc_nand_data,
>> {
>> int err = 0;
>> struct gpmc_settings s;
>> - struct device *dev = &gpmc_nand_device.dev;
>> -
>> - memset(&s, 0, sizeof(struct gpmc_settings));
>> + struct platform_device *pdev;
>> + struct resource gpmc_nand_res[] = {
>> + { .flags = IORESOURCE_MEM, },
>> + { .flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ, },
>> + { .flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ, },
>> + };
>>
>> - gpmc_nand_device.dev.platform_data = gpmc_nand_data;
>> + BUG_ON(gpmc_nand_data->cs >= GPMC_CS_NUM);
>>
>> err = gpmc_cs_request(gpmc_nand_data->cs, NAND_IO_SIZE,
>> - (unsigned long *)&gpmc_nand_resource[0].start);
>> + (unsigned long *)&gpmc_nand_res[0].start);
>> if (err < 0) {
>> - dev_err(dev, "Cannot request GPMC CS %d, error %d\n",
>> - gpmc_nand_data->cs, err);
>> + pr_err("omap2-gpmc: Cannot request GPMC CS %d, error %d\n",
>> + gpmc_nand_data->cs, err);
>> return err;
>> }
>> -
>> - gpmc_nand_resource[0].end = gpmc_nand_resource[0].start +
>> - NAND_IO_SIZE - 1;
>> -
>> - gpmc_nand_resource[1].start =
>> - gpmc_get_client_irq(GPMC_IRQ_FIFOEVENTENABLE);
>> - gpmc_nand_resource[2].start =
>> - gpmc_get_client_irq(GPMC_IRQ_COUNT_EVENT);
>> + gpmc_nand_res[0].end = gpmc_nand_res[0].start + NAND_IO_SIZE - 1;
>> + gpmc_nand_res[1].start = gpmc_get_client_irq(GPMC_IRQ_FIFOEVENTENABLE);
>> + gpmc_nand_res[2].start = gpmc_get_client_irq(GPMC_IRQ_COUNT_EVENT);
>>
>> if (gpmc_t) {
>> err = gpmc_cs_set_timings(gpmc_nand_data->cs, gpmc_t);
>> if (err < 0) {
>> - dev_err(dev, "Unable to set gpmc timings: %d\n", err);
>> + pr_err("omap2-gpmc: Unable to set gpmc timings: %d\n", err);
>> return err;
>> }
>> }
>>
>> + memset(&s, 0, sizeof(struct gpmc_settings));
>> if (gpmc_nand_data->of_node)
>> gpmc_read_settings_dt(gpmc_nand_data->of_node, &s);
>> else
>> gpmc_set_legacy(gpmc_nand_data, &s);
>>
>> s.device_nand = true;
>> -
>> err = gpmc_cs_program_settings(gpmc_nand_data->cs, &s);
>> if (err < 0)
>> goto out_free_cs;
>> @@ -141,18 +120,34 @@ int gpmc_nand_init(struct omap_nand_platform_data *gpmc_nand_data,
>> gpmc_update_nand_reg(&gpmc_nand_data->reg, gpmc_nand_data->cs);
>>
>> if (!gpmc_hwecc_bch_capable(gpmc_nand_data->ecc_opt)) {
>> - dev_err(dev, "Unsupported NAND ECC scheme selected\n");
>> - return -EINVAL;
>> + pr_err("omap2-nand: Unsupported NAND ECC scheme selected\n");
>> + err = -EINVAL;
>> + goto out_free_cs;
>> }
>>
>> - err = platform_device_register(&gpmc_nand_device);
>> - if (err < 0) {
>> - dev_err(dev, "Unable to register NAND device\n");
>> - goto out_free_cs;
>> +
>> + pdev = platform_device_alloc("omap2-nand", gpmc_nand_data->cs);
>> + if (pdev) {
>> + err = platform_device_add_resources(pdev, gpmc_nand_res,
>> + ARRAY_SIZE(gpmc_nand_res));
>> + if (!err)
>> + pdev->dev.platform_data = gpmc_nand_data;
>> + } else {
>> + err = -ENOMEM;
>> + }
>> + if (err)
>> + goto out_free_pdev;
>
> There is a slight problem here. If platform_device_alloc() fails,
> we must jump to 'out_free_cs' and not 'out_free_pdev'.
Nevermind. It shouldn't be a problem as platform_device_put() checks for NULL pdev.
cheers,
-roger
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists