lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 11 Jul 2014 14:05:42 +0200
From:	Olivier Sobrie <olivier@...rie.be>
To:	David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
Cc:	One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"j.dumon@...ion.com" <j.dumon@...ion.com>,
	"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] hso: fix deadlock when receiving bursts of data

On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 09:28:47AM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> From: Olivier Sobrie Olivier Sobrie
> > Hi Alan and Davids,
> > 
> > On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 04:50:03PM +0100, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
> > > On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 14:37:37 +0000
> > > David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM> wrote:
> > >
> > > > From: Olivier Sobrie
> > > > ...
> > > > > The function put_rxbuf_data() is called from the urb completion handler.
> > > > > It puts the data of the urb transfer in the tty buffer with
> > > > > tty_insert_flip_string_flags() and schedules a work queue in order to
> > > > > push the data to the ldisc.
> > > > > Problem is that we are in a urb completion handler so we can't wait
> > > > > until there is room in the tty buffer.
> > >
> > > The tty provides the input queue, if the queue is full then just chuck
> > > the data in the bitbucket.  hso is trying to be far too clever.
> > >
> > > If hso is fast enough that the buffering isn't sufficient on the tty side
> > > then we need to fix the tty buffer size.
> > 
> > Ok I'll adapt the patch to drop the data that can't be put in the tty
> > buffer. I test this and resend a new patch.
> 
> If you are going to drop data, then ideally you want to discard entire ppp
> packets. Depending on exactly how the interface works it might be that
> urb are likely to contain complete packets.

Indeed, urbs contains complete ppp packets. I see that the first and last
byte are equal to 0x7e.

> 
> So discarding entire urb might work better than discarding a few bytes.
> (But don't even think of scanning the data stream in the usb driver - except
> for experiments.)

I will check with tty_buffer_request_room() that there is enough room to
receive the frame before inserting the data in the tty buffer with
tty_insert_flip_string().

-- 
Olivier
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ