lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 11 Jul 2014 04:03:00 +0200
From:	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>
To:	amit daniel kachhap <amit.daniel@...sung.com>
CC:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
	Yadwinder Singh Brar <yadi.brar01@...il.com>,
	Tushar Behera <trblinux@...il.com>,
	Andreas Farber <afaerber@...e.de>,
	LAK <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org" 
	<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 15/23] regulator: max77686: Setup DVS-related GPIOs
 on probe

Hello Amit,

On 07/10/2014 12:08 PM, amit daniel kachhap wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
> <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk> wrote:
>> MAX77686 PMIC support Dyamic Voltage Scaling (DVS) on a set
>> of Buck regulators. A number of GPIO are connected to these
>> lines and are requested by the mfd driver. Setup the GPIO
>> pins from the regulator driver.
> If possible merge this patch with patch 8. Both are adding DVS
> support. Put regmap_copy dependency patch in very beginning.

As Lee already said, I split the changes to minimize the cross-subsystem churn.

>>
>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>
>> ---
>>  drivers/regulator/max77686.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/max77686.c b/drivers/regulator/max77686.c
>> index ef1af2d..ecce77a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/regulator/max77686.c
>> +++ b/drivers/regulator/max77686.c
>> @@ -435,6 +435,12 @@ static int max77686_pmic_dt_parse_pdata(struct platform_device *pdev,
>>  }
>>  #endif /* CONFIG_OF */
>>
>> +static inline bool max77686_is_dvs_buck(int id)
>> +{
>> +       /* BUCK 2,3 and 4 support DVS */
>> +       return (id >= MAX77686_BUCK2 && id <= MAX77686_BUCK4);
> I am just wondering if along with above check, SELB gpios (if present)
> can be used to confirm if BUCK's are DVS based or not.

I don't know if SELB gpios being present or not should be used to determine
whether a BUCK includes the DVS feature. AFAIK boards could have some of these
lines hardwired and pulled high or low instead of using a GPIO.

>> +}
>> +
>>  static int max77686_pmic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  {
>>         struct max77686_dev *iodev = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
>> @@ -442,6 +448,9 @@ static int max77686_pmic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>         struct max77686_data *max77686;
>>         int i, ret = 0;
>>         struct regulator_config config = { };
>> +       unsigned int reg;
>> +       int buck_default_idx;
>> +       int buck_old_idx;
>>
>>         dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "%s\n", __func__);
>>
>> @@ -472,13 +481,34 @@ static int max77686_pmic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>         config.driver_data = max77686;
>>         platform_set_drvdata(pdev, max77686);
>>
>> +       buck_default_idx = pdata->buck_default_idx;
>> +       buck_old_idx = max77686_read_gpios(pdata);
>> +
>>         for (i = 0; i < MAX77686_REGULATORS; i++) {
>>                 struct regulator_dev *rdev;
>> +               int id = pdata->regulators[i].id;
>>
>>                 config.init_data = pdata->regulators[i].initdata;
>>                 config.of_node = pdata->regulators[i].of_node;
>>
>>                 max77686->opmode[i] = regulators[i].enable_mask;
>> +
>> +               if (max77686_is_dvs_buck(id)) {
>> +                       /* Try to copy over data so we keep firmware settings */
>> +                       reg = regulators[i].vsel_reg;
>> +
>> +                       ret = regmap_reg_copy(iodev->regmap,
>> +                                             reg + buck_default_idx,
>> +                                             reg + buck_old_idx);
>> +
>> +                       if (ret)
>> +                               dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Copy err %d => %d (%d)\n",
>> +                                        reg + buck_old_idx,
>> +                                        reg + buck_default_idx, ret);
>> +
>> +                       regulators[i].vsel_reg += buck_default_idx;
>> +               }
>> +
>>                 rdev = devm_regulator_register(&pdev->dev,
>>                                                 &regulators[i], &config);
>>                 if (IS_ERR(rdev)) {
>> @@ -488,6 +518,10 @@ static int max77686_pmic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>                 }
>>         }
>>
>> +       ret = max77686_setup_gpios(iodev->dev);
>> +       if (ret)
>> +               return ret;
>> +
>>         return 0;
>>  }
>>
>> --
>> 2.0.0.rc2
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

Best regards,
Javier
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists