[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140711132309.GH20603@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 15:23:09 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Alexander Yarygin <yarygin@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] perf: Destroy event's children on task exit
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 01:56:19PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
>
> When task exits we close:
> 1) all events that are installed in task
> 2) all events owned by task (via file descriptor)
>
> But we don't close children events of 2) events. Those children
> events stay until the child task exits and are useless with the
> parent being gone, because we have no way to get to values any
> more.
>
> Plus if the event stays installed in task even with the owner task
> gone, it runs the perf callback any time the task forks, for no
> real reason.
>
> Closing all children events events when the owner task of the
> parent event is closed.
So I _think_ the reason we didn't do this is because this is potentially
very expensive and keeping them around isn't too much bother, they'll
die eventually.
But I can't really remember. Ingo any recollections / opinions?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists