[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1407111526430.8779@pobox.suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 15:27:34 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
cc: Jet Chen <jet.chen@...el.com>, Su Tao <tao.su@...el.com>,
Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@...el.com>, LKP <lkp@...org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [workqueue] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 76 at drivers/block/floppy.c:968
schedule_bh()
On Tue, 8 Jul 2014, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> > > Hmmm... this is schedule_bh() in floppy.c complaining that the work
> > > item is already pending. The cond_resched() addition by b22ce2785d97
> > > doesn't change the semantics around work item execution although it
> > > could have exposed an existing problem in the floppy driver. I'll
> > > look into how this could happen.
> >
> > It doesn't reproduce here and nothing really stands out to me. It
> > probably involves floppy_work requeueing itself and something else
> > getting executed inbetween which wouldn't have happend before, but I
> > can't figure out what that could be and either can I follow the
> > control flow the driver. :)
> >
> >
> > Jiri, any ideas?
>
> I will take a look. Could this be a bad bisect though due to this actually
> being a race condition perhaps?
Fengguang, is it possible for you to confirm the bisection result (i.e.
revert the patch and check)?
I am having hard time seeing how it could cause this (and I am not able to
reproduce the problem myself).
Thanks,
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists