[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53BF4B5A.3000302@hitachi.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 11:26:34 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Seth Jennings <sjenning@...hat.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] ftrace: Add dynamically allocated trampolines
(2014/07/11 6:44), Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jul 2014, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>
>> I did some testing with kpatch and I found one minor issue. The dynamically
>> allocated trampoline seems to confuse dump_stack() somewhat.
>>
>> I added a dump_stack() call in my ftrace_ops callback function
>> (kpatch_ftrace_handler) which had a filter on meminfo_proc_show().
>
> Interesting. Are you using dwarf2 unwinder for stack dumping by any
> chance? It seems to get things right here. Will look into it more
> tomorrow.
Hmm, can dwarf2 unwinder work on the trampoline method?
Since the trampoline just a copy of instructions which
will not have CFI(which is stored in dwarf section),
I guess it may not work...
Frame pointer (push bp and save sp to bp on the entry) can
work anyway.
Thank you,
--
Masami HIRAMATSU
Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Research Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists