[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL1qeaGOW8U6B0rLvFZKLzoZviMZwWJcfmXdmgZA329Mmvy_Ow@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 09:33:47 -0700
From: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@...omium.org>
To: Tuomas Tynkkynen <ttynkkynen@...dia.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/13] cpufreq: Add cpufreq driver for Tegra124
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Tuomas Tynkkynen <ttynkkynen@...dia.com> wrote:
>
> On the hardware level, the two I2C controllers sharing the same pins
> have knowledge of each other and won't start transmitting if the bus
> is busy (something different from the usual I2C arbitration, that is).
> I guess on the kernel side there could be a problem if the voltage register
> is marked cached in the PMIC driver's regmap.
Yeah, in our tree we have a hack to disable regcache for SD0_VOLTAGE.
Other than the value reported to userspace being wrong, leaving it as
cacheable shouldn't be an issue if no other drivers try to read/write
that register.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists