linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] can: flexcan: add vf61x support for flexcan

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <53C024B2.60404@pengutronix.de>
Date:	Fri, 11 Jul 2014 19:53:54 +0200
From:	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To:	Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
CC:	wg@...ndegger.com, shawn.guo@...escale.com, kernel@...gutronix.de,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] can: flexcan: add vf61x support for flexcan

On 07/11/2014 03:58 PM, Stefan Agner wrote:
> Hi Marc,
> 
> Am 2014-07-11 14:09, schrieb Marc Kleine-Budde:
>> IMHO it should be 4 seperate patches:
>> - dt
>> - clocks
>> - flexcan_get_berr_counter fixes
>> - your flexcan enhancements
> 
> Ok, will split.
> 
>>> @@ -362,7 +374,7 @@
>>>
>>>  			esdhc1: esdhc@...b2000 {
>>>  				compatible = "fsl,imx53-esdhc";
>>> -				reg = <0x400b2000 0x4000>;
>>> +				reg = <0x400b2000 0x1000>;
>>
>> What's that doing here? :)
> 
> That's an error I just stumbled upon. I know it's not related but it's
> such a small change... Do I need to make a separate patch for that or
> can I include it in the FlexCAN dt commit?

Yes, please post it to Shawn (& linux-arm) directly.

> 
>>> @@ -150,18 +171,20 @@
>>>   * FLEXCAN hardware feature flags
>>>   *
>>>   * Below is some version info we got:
>>> - *    SOC   Version   IP-Version  Glitch-  [TR]WRN_INT
>>> - *                                Filter?   connected?
>>> - *   MX25  FlexCAN2  03.00.00.00     no         no
>>> - *   MX28  FlexCAN2  03.00.04.00    yes        yes
>>> - *   MX35  FlexCAN2  03.00.00.00     no         no
>>> - *   MX53  FlexCAN2  03.00.00.00    yes         no
>>> - *   MX6s  FlexCAN3  10.00.12.00    yes        yes
>>> + *    SOC   Version   IP-Version  Glitch-  [TR]WRN_INT  Memory err
>>> + *                                Filter?   connected?  detection
>>> + *   MX25  FlexCAN2  03.00.00.00     no         no	   no
>>> + *   MX28  FlexCAN2  03.00.04.00    yes        yes	   no
>>> + *   MX35  FlexCAN2  03.00.00.00     no         no	   no
>>> + *   MX53  FlexCAN2  03.00.00.00    yes         no	   no
>>> + *   MX6s  FlexCAN3  10.00.12.00    yes        yes	   no
>>> + *   VFxx  FlexCAN3  ?		     no		no	  yes
>>
>> Please use either tabs or space to indent in this table.
> 
> Ok, btw, do you know how I can obtain the IP version?

Get in touch with a freescale engineer with VHDL access, meet in a
bar...ask her/him....Something like this :)

Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                  | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Industrial Linux Solutions        | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Vertretung West/Dortmund          | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686  | http://www.pengutronix.de   |


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (243 bytes)