[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1407111405280.5070@gentwo.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 14:11:02 -0500 (CDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <liwanp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@...fujitsu.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Jianyu Zhan <nasa4836@...il.com>, malc <av1474@...tv.ru>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-hotplug@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch V1 07/30] mm: Use cpu_to_mem()/numa_mem_id() to
support memoryless node
On Fri, 11 Jul 2014, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 12:29:30PM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > GFP_THISNODE is mostly used by allocators that need memory from specific
> > nodes. The use of numa_mem_id() there is useful because one will not
> > get any memory at all when attempting to allocate from a memoryless
> > node using GFP_THISNODE.
>
> As long as it's in allocator proper, it doesn't matter all that much
> but the changes are clearly not contained, are they?
Well there is a proliferation of memory allocators recently. NUMA is often
a second thought in those.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists