[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1405107531.2796.21.camel@joe-AO725>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 12:38:51 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Jerome Glisse <j.glisse@...il.com>
Cc: "Bridgman, John" <John.Bridgman@....com>,
Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@...il.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
"Deucher, Alexander" <Alexander.Deucher@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"Lewycky, Andrew" <Andrew.Lewycky@....com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
"Gabbay, Oded" <Oded.Gabbay@....com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
Sandeep Nair <sandeep_n@...com>,
Kenneth Heitke <kheitke@...eaurora.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>,
Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@...il.com>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/83] hsa/radeon: Add code base of hsa driver for AMD's
GPUs
On Fri, 2014-07-11 at 15:22 -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> Just to be explicit, my point is that is you claim GPL in MODULE_LICENSE
> then this is a GPL licensed code, if you claim GPL with additional rights
> than this is dual licensed code. This is how i read and interpret this
> with additional rights. In all the case the radeon code is considered
> dual license ie GPL+BSD (at least this is how i consider that code).
This is pretty common:
MODULE_LICENSE("Dual BSD/GPL");
There are a couple hundred of them.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists