linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] rcutorture: fixes for printing message buffer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 11 Jul 2014 13:37:01 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@...il.com>
Cc:	Josh Triplett <josh@...edesktop.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
	Iulia Manda <iulia.manda21@...il.com>,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] rcutorture: fixes for printing message buffer

On Fri, 2014-07-11 at 16:30 -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
> Use snprintf() instead of sprintf() for writing to the message buffer.
> Also use vmalloc() for the allocation of the message buffer. Since pr_alert() is
> limited to print LOG_LINE_MAX characters at a time, we print the buffer in a
> loop one line at a time.
> 
> I tested this using the parse-torture.sh script as follows:

Did you see the patch I sent you?
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/20/604

It doesn't need a vmalloc.
What is wrong with that approach?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/