[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140711205106.GB20603@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 22:51:06 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-hotplug@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch V1 00/30] Enable memoryless node on x86 platforms
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 01:20:51PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> writes:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 10:29:56AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 03:37:17PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
> >> > Any comments are welcomed!
> >>
> >> Why would anybody _ever_ have a memoryless node? That's ridiculous.
> >
> > I'm with Peter here, why would this be a situation that we should even
> > support? Are there machines out there shipping like this?
>
> We've always had memory nodes.
>
> A classic case in the old days was a two socket system where someone
> didn't populate any DIMMs on the second socket.
That's a obvious; don't do that then case. Its silly.
> There are other cases too.
Are there any sane ones?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists