linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] xen: Introduce 'xen_nopv' to disable PV extensions for HVM guests.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <53C06A94.3040702@zytor.com>
Date:	Fri, 11 Jul 2014 15:52:04 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	konrad@...nel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
	david.vrabel@...rix.com, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen: Introduce 'xen_nopv' to disable PV extensions for
 HVM guests.

On 07/11/2014 12:53 PM, konrad@...nel.org wrote:
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> index c1b9aa8..5dcfa6e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> @@ -3691,6 +3691,10 @@ bytes respectively. Such letter suffixes can also be entirely omitted.
>  			Disables the ticketlock slowpath using Xen PV
>  			optimizations.
>  
> +	xen_nopv	[X86,XEN]
> +			Disables the PV optimizations forcing the guest to run
> +			as generic HVM guest with no PV drivers.
> +
>  	xirc2ps_cs=	[NET,PCMCIA]
>  			Format:
>  			<irq>,<irq_mask>,<io>,<full_duplex>,<do_sound>,<lockup_hack>[,<irq2>[,<irq3>[,<irq4>]]]
> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> index ffb101e..eb82239 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> @@ -1826,8 +1826,19 @@ static void __init xen_hvm_guest_init(void)
>  	xen_hvm_init_mmu_ops();
>  }
>  
> +static bool xen_nopv = false;
> +static __init int xen_parse_nopv(char *arg)
> +{
> +       xen_nopv = true;
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +early_param("xen_nopv", xen_parse_nopv);
> +
>  static uint32_t __init xen_hvm_platform(void)
>  {
> +	if (xen_nopv)
> +		return 0;
> +
>  	if (xen_pv_domain())
>  		return 0;
>  
> @@ -1836,6 +1847,8 @@ static uint32_t __init xen_hvm_platform(void)
>  
>  bool xen_hvm_need_lapic(void)
>  {
> +	if (xen_nopv)
> +		return false;
>  	if (xen_pv_domain())
>  		return false;
>  	if (!xen_hvm_domain())
> 

Any reason to not simply let xen_pv_domain() return false here?

Also, the latter seems a bit odd?

	-hpa

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/