linux-kernel - [RFC PATCH 2/2] irqchip: GIC: introduce method to deactive interupts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1405061177-43834-3-git-send-email-sdu.liu@huawei.com>
Date:	Fri, 11 Jul 2014 14:46:17 +0800
From:	Liu Hua <sdu.liu@...wei.com>
To:	<tglx@...utronix.de>, <jason@...edaemon.net>,
	<nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>, <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	<will.deacon@....com>, <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC:	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <wangnan0@...wei.com>,
	<liuxueliu.liu@...wei.com>, <peifeiyue@...wei.com>,
	<liusdu@...wei.com>, Liu Hua <sdu.liu@...wei.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 2/2] irqchip: GIC: introduce method to deactive interupts

When using kdump on ARM platform, if kernel panics in interrupt handler
(maybe PPI or SPI), the capture kernel can not recive certain interrupt,
and fails to boot.

On this situation, We have read register GICC_IAR. But we have no chance
to write relative bit to register GICC_EOIR(kernel paniced before). So
the state of this type interrupt remains active. Ant that makes gic not
deliver this type interrupt to cpu interface.

So we should not assume that all interruts state of GIC is inactive when
kernel initailize the GIC. This patch identifies this type interrupts
and deactives them;

Signed-off-by: Liu Hua <sdu.liu@...wei.com>
---
 drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
index ddee133..d8620cf 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
@@ -352,12 +352,68 @@ static u8 gic_get_cpumask(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
 	return mask;
 }
 
+void gic_v1_eois(u32 active, void __iomem *cpu_base)
+{
+	int bit = -1;
+
+	while ((bit = find_next_bit((unsigned long *) &active,
+						32, bit + 1)) < 32) {
+		writel_relaxed(bit, cpu_base + GIC_CPU_EOI);
+	}
+}
+
+void gic_v1_clear_active(void __iomem *dist_base,
+			void __iomem *cpu_base, int gic_irqs)
+{
+	int irq, offset;
+	u32 active;
+
+	for (irq = 0; irq < gic_irqs; irq += 32) {
+		offset = GIC_DIST_ACTIVE_SET + irq * 4 / 32;
+		active = readl_relaxed(dist_base + offset);
+		if (!active)
+			continue;
+		gic_v1_eois(active, cpu_base);
+	}
+}
+
+void gic_v2_clear_active(void __iomem *dist_base, int gic_irqs)
+{
+	int irq, offset;
+	u32 active;
+
+	for (irq = 0; irq < gic_irqs; irq += 32) {
+		offset = irq * 4 / 32 + GIC_DIST_ACTIVE_SET;
+		active = readl_relaxed(dist_base + offset);
+		if (!active)
+			continue;
+		offset = irq * 4 / 32 + GIC_DIST_ACTIVE_CLEAR;
+		writel_relaxed(active, dist_base + offset);
+	}
+}
+
+void __init gic_dist_clear_active(void __iomem *dist_base,
+					void __iomem *cpu_base, int gic_irqs)
+{
+	u32 ArchRev;
+
+	ArchRev = readl_relaxed(dist_base + GIC_DIST_ICPIDR2);
+	ArchRev = (ArchRev >> 4) & 0xF;
+
+	if (ArchRev == 0x1) {
+		gic_v1_clear_active(dist_base, cpu_base, gic_irqs);
+	} else {
+		gic_v2_clear_active(dist_base, gic_irqs);
+	}
+}
+
 static void __init gic_dist_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
 {
 	unsigned int i;
 	u32 cpumask;
 	unsigned int gic_irqs = gic->gic_irqs;
 	void __iomem *base = gic_data_dist_base(gic);
+	void __iomem *cpu_base = gic_data_cpu_base(gic);
 
 	writel_relaxed(0, base + GIC_DIST_CTRL);
 
@@ -371,6 +427,7 @@ static void __init gic_dist_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
 		writel_relaxed(cpumask, base + GIC_DIST_TARGET + i * 4 / 4);
 
 	gic_dist_config(base, gic_irqs, NULL);
+	gic_dist_clear_active(base, cpu_base, gic_irqs);
 
 	writel_relaxed(1, base + GIC_DIST_CTRL);
 }
-- 
1.9.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/