linux-kernel - Re: [RFC Patch V1 00/30] Enable memoryless node on x86 platforms

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 11 Jul 2014 16:51:01 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-hotplug@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch V1 00/30] Enable memoryless node on x86 platforms

On 07/11/2014 01:20 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> writes:
> 
>> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 10:29:56AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 03:37:17PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
>>>> Any comments are welcomed!
>>>
>>> Why would anybody _ever_ have a memoryless node? That's ridiculous.
>>
>> I'm with Peter here, why would this be a situation that we should even
>> support?  Are there machines out there shipping like this?
> 
> We've always had memory nodes.
> 
> A classic case in the old days was a two socket system where someone
> didn't populate any DIMMs on the second socket.
> 
> There are other cases too.
> 

Yes, like a node controller-based system where the system can be
populated with either memory cards or CPU cards, for example.  Now you
can have both memoryless nodes and memory-only nodes...

Memory-only nodes also happen in real life.  In some cases they are done
by permanently putting low-frequency CPUs to sleep for their memory
controllers.
	
	-hpa


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/