lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAFLxGvyJRr4dXEqv2KfCf30Q-kiA6=mPcKB+m4i1y79Xeoqe3A@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2014 18:16:36 +0200 From: Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com> To: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>, "ohering@...e.com" <ohering@...e.com>, "jbottomley@...allels.com" <jbottomley@...allels.com>, "jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>, "apw@...onical.com" <apw@...onical.com>, "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] Drivers: scsi: storvsc: Implement an abort handler On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 8:51 PM, KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com> wrote: >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Christoph Hellwig [mailto:hch@...radead.org] >>> Sent: Wednesday, July 9, 2014 1:44 AM >>> To: KY Srinivasan >>> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; devel@...uxdriverproject.org; >>> ohering@...e.com; jbottomley@...allels.com; jasowang@...hat.com; >>> apw@...onical.com; linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org >>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] Drivers: scsi: storvsc: Implement an abort handler >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 05:46:50PM -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote: >>> > Implement a simple abort handler. The host does not support "Abort"; >>> > just ensure that all inflight I/Os have been accounted for. >>> >>> The abort handler should abort a single command, not wait for all of them. >>> What issue do you see that this tries to address? >> >> On Azure, we sometimes have unbounded I/O latencies and some distributions (such as SLES12) based on recent kernels are invoking >> the "Abort Handler". Unfortunately, our scsi emulation on the host does not support aborting a command. >> The issue I have seen is that the upper level scsi code attempts error recovery when the command times out and finally frees up the command. >> The host subsequently responds to the command that has timed out and since the memory has been freed up, we end up touching freed memory >> in this driver. Since the host is also doing error recovery, by just delaying the error handler in the guest until we can account for all the in-flight commands, >> we can get around the problem. > > I see strange issues in Azure and maybe they are related to this. > Some Linux machines crash in a way that no disk IO is possible (thus, > no SSH for me) but they still respond to > ping. It happens rather seldom (every few weeks). > > Do you see similar symptoms? ping? -- Thanks, //richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists