[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0b46d9d7-30f7-4aee-be9e-dd83cf8056d9@email.android.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 19:26:50 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
CC: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86_64,signal: Remove 'fs' and 'gs' from sigcontext
Our current handling of fs/vs is really weird. The best may very well be to explicitly save and restore both fs and he as part of Andi's patchset to support wrxsbase.
On July 11, 2014 7:21:54 PM PDT, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
>wrote:
>> As far as I can tell, these fields have been set to zero on save and
>> ignored on restore since Linux was imported into git. Rename them
>> '__pad1' and '__pad2' to avoid confusion and to allow them to be
>> recycled some day.
>
>Shouldn't we actually try to save/restore gs/fs properly? Admittedly,
>changing them in the signal handler would be insane, but still.. See
>our context switching code with the whole segment selector vs base
>save/restore code. Hmm?
>
> Linus
--
Sent from my mobile phone. Please pardon brevity and lack of formatting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists