[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53C2AFE7.5080505@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2014 19:12:23 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi.kivity@...il.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Eric Northup <digitaleric@...gle.com>
CC: KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86 emulator: emulate MOVNTDQ
On 07/11/2014 11:40 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 11/07/2014 22:05, Alex Williamson ha scritto:
>> Which will return 'true' for this whether I specify Aligned or not. If
>> the standard convention is to make it explicit, I'm happy to add the
>> extra flag, but I think we already #GP on unaligned as implemented here.
>> Thanks,
>
> We should still specify Aligned if the corresponding AVX instruction
> requires an aligned operand. ISTR that this is not the case for
> MOVNTDQ, so your patch is correct. I'll check the SDM more carefully
> next Monday.
>
The explicitly aligned/unaligned instructions have an A or a U to
indicate this (e.g. MOVDQU = explicitly unaligned, MOVDQA = explicitly
aligned, MOVNTDQ = default).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists