[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <6C1FDCA1-4550-45AC-A8CD-78FF8EB268BD@zytor.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2014 09:40:26 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc: Oren Twaig <oren@...lemp.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Yoshihiro YUNOMAE <yoshihiro.yunomae.ez@...achi.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@...fujitsu.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Ping: Re: [PATCH v2] x86, vsmp: Remove is_vsmp_box() from apic_is_clustered_box()
Yes, although sometimes pings we useful to keep things from getting lost. Typically 1-2 weeks without response is a good reason to ping. *Don't repost*, just put a ping as a reply to the original 0/ patch, which in most threaded mail readers brings the thread back to the front.
Sent from my tablet, pardon any formatting problems.
> On Jul 13, 2014, at 2:10, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at> wrote:
>
> Am 13.07.2014 08:51, schrieb Oren Twaig:
>> ping
>> On 07/06/2014 09:33 AM, Oren Twaig wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Quick question: As I'm new at this (submitting patches), what is a reasonable
>>> time to wait before ping-ing a patch ?
>>>
>>> Oren.
>
> AFACT Peter is still crawling through his mail backlog to catch up.
>
> Thanks,
> //richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists