[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53C291C8.6050303@nod.at>
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2014 16:03:52 +0200
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
CC: Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@...il.com>, Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, thierry.reding@...il.com,
jic23@...nel.org, wim@...ana.be,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
kys@...rosoft.com, Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
teg@...m.no, Mischa.Jonker@...opsys.com, msalter@...hat.com,
knaack.h@....de, rdunlap@...radead.org,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, Liqin Chen <liqin.linux@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: Let several drivers depends on HAS_IOMEM for
'devm_ioremap_resource'
Am 13.07.2014 15:56, schrieb Lars-Peter Clausen:
> On 07/13/2014 03:40 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> Am 13.07.2014 15:26, schrieb Lars-Peter Clausen:
>>> On 07/13/2014 11:45 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>>> Am 13.07.2014 11:27, schrieb Lennox Wu:
>>>>> As I said before, some configurations don't make sense.
>>>>
>>>> If such a configuration can be achieved using allmod/yesconfig it has to be fixed.
>>>> Chen's fixes seem reasonable as not all architectures support iomem.
>>>
>>> Maybe we should stub out ioremap() and friends when COMPILE_TEST is enabled to avoid these linker errors. That's in my opinion better than turning most of the 'depends on
>>> COMPILE_TEST' into 'depends on COMPILE_TEST && HAS_IOMEM'. The issue comes up quite a lot and it is often overlooked when adding a driver that can be build when COMPILE_TEST is
>>> enabled.
>>
>> And what should this stub do?
>> Except calling BUG()...
>
> return NULL;
>
> It's for compile testing, it's not meant to work at runtime.
Hm, I really don't like the idea of having a non-working kernel.
IMHO either it should build _and_ run and nothing else.
Greg, what do you think?
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists