[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140714071823.GE15237@phenom.ffwll.local>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 09:18:23 +0200
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: drm: i915: "plane B assertion failure, should be off on pipe B
but is still active"
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 09:13:40AM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 08:56 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Please test the below patch, thanks.
> > -Daniel
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > index 82e7d57f0a8a..f0be855ddf45 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > @@ -11914,6 +11914,7 @@ static void intel_sanitize_crtc(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> > * ... */
> > plane = crtc->plane;
> > crtc->plane = !plane;
> > + crtc->primary_enabled = true;
> > dev_priv->display.crtc_disable(&crtc->base);
> > crtc->plane = plane;
> >
>
> Instead of the revert or on top of the revert?
Instead of the revert as an attempt at a proper bugfix. If it doesn't work
my theory about what's going on on your machine is all wrong ;-)
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists