linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv8 2/2] mailbox: Introduce framework for mailbox

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJ5Y-eb3EqbmNNKFPFShiBEDEf11pPMg2hVhMz=RPt+1H+FyZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 14 Jul 2014 09:04:05 +0100
From:	Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@...aro.org>
To:	Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>
Cc:	Devicetree List <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"ks.giri@...sung.com" <ks.giri@...sung.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	"ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk" <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Courtney Cavin <courtney.cavin@...ymobile.com>,
	Matt Porter <mporter@...aro.org>,
	Craig McGeachie <slapdau@...oo.com.au>,
	LeyFoon Tan <lftan.linux@...il.com>,
	Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@...com>,
	"Anna, Suman" <s-anna@...com>, Bjorn Andersson <bjorn@...o.se>,
	Patch Tracking <patches@...aro.org>,
	"Mollie.Wu" <Mollie.Wu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Tetsuya Takinishi <t.takinishi@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv8 2/2] mailbox: Introduce framework for mailbox

Hello,

On 14 July 2014 05:17, Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org> wrote:
> On 11 July 2014 17:16, Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@...aro.org> wrote:
>> Hi Jassi,
>>
>> Other than a few nits, this looks good to me.
>>
> Thanks for the nits. I will club them together with other feedback on
> the patchset.
>
>>
>> Hopefully you've run this through checkpatch as well? Also, were you
>> able to sort out the process of getting this stuff hosted on Linaro's
>> git servers? or elsewhere? It would really help maintainers to pick
>> this up and for others to rebase on top of your changes.
>>
> I didn't think it was a good idea to keep a 'dev-branch' for a new
> subsystem before having even a single Ack or Reviewed-by.  Users
> should track patch revisions on mailing lists and later maintainers
> will be sent a tree:branch to pick Acked patches from.

Your private dev branch doesn't need to have any Acks/Reviewed-bys.
You can add my signature after addressing the feedback.

Reviewed-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@...aro.org>

Cheers,
Ashwin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/