linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 1/4] staging: vt6556: Cleanup coding style issues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 14 Jul 2014 10:59:32 +0200
From:	Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@...il.com>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@...il.com>,
	forest@...ttletooquiet.net, tvboxspy@...il.com,
	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/4] staging: vt6556: Cleanup coding style issues

On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 12:36:47PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 09:11:18PM +0200, Peter Senna Tschudin wrote:
> > This patch cleanup coding style issues reported by checkpatch.
> > 
> > Tested by compilation only.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@...il.com>
> > ---
> > Cahnges from V1:
> >  - Sent all patches in a series
> 
> Why did you forget the other thing that I asked you to change?
> 
> I can't take these as-is, sorry, please go back and re-read what I
> wrote...

Actually I was trying to do what you asked me on this E-mail:

-- // --
You just sent me 4 patches, all with the same subject (but at least 2 of
them had the order in which to apply them in, which is nice.)

Please redo these such that they have a unique subject, and I can tell
which order to apply them in, as I really have no idea about the second
two.
-- // --

I'm sending V3 as a single patch.


> 
> greg k-h

View attachment "0001-staging-vt6556-Cleanup-coding-style-issues.patch" of type "text/plain" (15553 bytes)