[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53C3C517.4000500@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 13:55:03 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: kan.liang@...el.com, peterz@...radead.org
CC: andi@...stfloor.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 1/2] perf ignore LBR and extra_regs
Il 10/07/2014 12:59, kan.liang@...el.com ha scritto:
> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
>
> x86, perf: Protect LBR and extra_regs against KVM lying
>
> With -cpu host, KVM reports LBR and extra_regs support, if the host has support.
> When the guest perf driver tries to access LBR or extra_regs MSR,
> it #GPs all MSR accesses,since KVM doesn't handle LBR and extra_regs support.
> So check the related MSRs access right once at initialization time to avoid the error access at runtime.
>
> For reproducing the issue, please build the kernel with CONFIG_KVM_INTEL = y (for host kernel).
> And CONFIG_PARAVIRT = n and CONFIG_KVM_GUEST = n (for guest kernel).
I'm not sure this is a useful patch.
This is #GP'ing just because of a limitation in the PMU; just compile
the kernel with CONFIG_PARAVIRT, or split the "rdmsr is always
rdmsr_safe" behavior out of CONFIG_PARAVIRT and into a new Kconfig symbol.
In fact there's no reason why LBR cannot be virtualized (though it does
need support from the processor), and it may even be possible to support
OFFCORE_RSP_X in the KVM virtual PMU.
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists