linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] staging: android: Clean up else statement from binder_send_failed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJyon0t9zQWeuXZ6KUDqCQCiZU4wrGYPc+sCh72NBWGOFoCXxw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 13 Jul 2014 21:35:40 -0300
From:	Lucas Tanure <tanure@...ux.com>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] staging: android: Clean up else statement from binder_send_failed_reply

Ok. I will do it.
4th could be the right one =p.

Thanks for your time
Cheers

--
Lucas Tanure
+55 (19) 988176559


On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 9:13 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 08:25:13PM -0300, Lucas Tanure wrote:
>> Kernel coding style. Remove useless else statement after return.
>> Changes from v1 and v2: Fix warning for mixed declarations and code.
>> Declaration of "struct binder_transaction *next" made outside of while,
>> and initialized with NULL.
>
> Why did you initialize it with NULL?  It's not needed to do this, right?
>
> 4th time's a charm?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/