[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <37D7C6CF3E00A74B8858931C1DB2F077014E1A91@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 13:36:02 +0000
From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...el.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: "andi@...stfloor.org" <andi@...stfloor.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V5 1/2] perf ignore LBR and extra_regs
> >>> For reproducing the issue, please build the kernel with
> CONFIG_KVM_INTEL = y (for host kernel).
> >>> And CONFIG_PARAVIRT = n and CONFIG_KVM_GUEST = n (for guest
> kernel).
> >>
> >> I'm not sure this is a useful patch.
> >>
> >> This is #GP'ing just because of a limitation in the PMU; just compile
> >> the kernel with CONFIG_PARAVIRT
> >
> > How's that going to help? If you run kvm -host the VM is lying through
> > its teeth is the kernel is going to assume all those MSRs present,
> > PARAVIRT isn't going to help with this.
> >
> >> , or split the "rdmsr is always rdmsr_safe"
> >> behavior out of CONFIG_PARAVIRT and into a new Kconfig symbol.
> >
> > That's not useful either, because non of these code-paths are going to
> > check the return value.
>
> Hmmm, I thought rdmsr_safe was going to return zero, but it just returns
> whatever happened to be in edx:eax which maybe should also be fixed.
>
> Kan Liang, what happens if CONFIG_PARAVIRT=y? Do you get garbage or
> just no events reported?
>
Guest rdmsr/wrmsr will eventually call rdmsr_safe/wrmsr_safe. They will handle the #GP. So there is no error report in guest.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists