lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 14 Jul 2014 08:53:31 -0500 (CDT)
From:	Christoph Lameter <>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <>
cc:	Frederic Weisbecker <>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <>,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/17] rcu: Bind grace-period kthreads to

On Fri, 11 Jul 2014, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 02:05:08PM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > The use case is pretty straightforward because we are trying to keep as
> > much OS noise as possible off most processors. Processor 0 is the
> > sacrificial lamb that will be used for all OS processing and hopefully all
> > high latency operations will occur there. Processors 1-X have a tick but
> > we still try to keep latencies sane. And then there is X-Y where tick is
> > off.
> So the problem is -- and this isn't too hard to create -- when we
> saturate/overload cpu0 with just the housekeeping. At that point it
> would be good if we could scale and use multiple housekeepers.

Well we would simply add another machine at that point but there are
certainly configurations in which we would also want multiple housekeeping

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists