[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1407141615130.24854@nanos>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 16:15:35 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 54/55] timekeeping: Provide fast and NMI safe access to
CLOCK_MONOTONIC[_RAW]
On Mon, 14 Jul 2014, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@...radead.org>
> > To: "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>
> > Cc: "LKML" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "John Stultz" <john.stultz@...aro.org>, "Steven Rostedt"
> > <rostedt@...dmis.org>, "Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
> > Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 5:47:50 AM
> > Subject: Re: [patch 54/55] timekeeping: Provide fast and NMI safe access to CLOCK_MONOTONIC[_RAW]
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 01:45:19PM -0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > +static struct tk_fast tk_fast_raw ____cacheline_aligned;
> > > +static struct tk_fast tk_fast_mono ____cacheline_aligned;
> >
> > Question to the 'trace maniacs'; why do you lot need access to mono_raw?
> >
> > I would much prefer to limit choice here.
>
> For LTTng, which I guess qualifies as bring part of the aforementioned
> trace maniacs group, we only need the "tk_fast_mono" clock. We don't
> need mono_raw.
>
> We can then correlate with user-space traces by using tk_fast_mono in
> kernel-space and using CLOCK_MONOTONIC in userspace.
I'm happy to ditch the raw one ...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists