[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53C41213.6020102@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 10:23:31 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
CC: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Ben Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] asm-generic/io.h: Implement generic {read,write}s*()
On 07/14/14 02:10, Thierry Reding wrote:
> The reason behind this was that people have been told to migrate towards
> using io{read,write}{8,16,32}_rep() because {read,write}s{b,w,l}() are
> not as "portable". The only reason why the aren't portable is because no
> generic versions of them existed. That's what this series originally
> started out as.
>
> Also, it's somewhat backwards (and inconsistent) to go through the io*()
> functions when it's known up front that the device will always only be
> memory-mapped and never I/O mapped. So with these patches going forward,
> people should be using either {read,write}{,s}{b,w,l}() *or* their
> io{read,write}{8,16,32}{,_rep}() counterparts, not mixing them.
>
Thanks. Can we please have this explanation in the commit text?
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists