lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 14 Jul 2014 14:12:51 -0400
From:	Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@...il.com>
To:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org (open list:DOCUMENTATION),
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] doc: cpu-hotplug.txt: Minor grammar fix

fix minor grammar in sentence

Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@...il.com>
---
 Documentation/cpu-hotplug.txt | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/cpu-hotplug.txt b/Documentation/cpu-hotplug.txt
index a0b005d..2ec86f6 100644
--- a/Documentation/cpu-hotplug.txt
+++ b/Documentation/cpu-hotplug.txt
@@ -383,7 +383,7 @@ A: The following are what is required for CPU hotplug infrastructure to work
                           dead routine is called to be sure positively.
 
 Q: I need to ensure that a particular cpu is not removed when there is some
-   work specific to this cpu is in progress.
+   work specific to this cpu in progress.
 A: There are two ways.  If your code can be run in interrupt context, use
    smp_call_function_single(), otherwise use work_on_cpu().  Note that
    work_on_cpu() is slow, and can fail due to out of memory:
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ