[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1405361572-8277-1-git-send-email-bobby.prani@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 14:12:51 -0400
From: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@...il.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org (open list:DOCUMENTATION),
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] doc: cpu-hotplug.txt: Minor grammar fix
fix minor grammar in sentence
Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@...il.com>
---
Documentation/cpu-hotplug.txt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/cpu-hotplug.txt b/Documentation/cpu-hotplug.txt
index a0b005d..2ec86f6 100644
--- a/Documentation/cpu-hotplug.txt
+++ b/Documentation/cpu-hotplug.txt
@@ -383,7 +383,7 @@ A: The following are what is required for CPU hotplug infrastructure to work
dead routine is called to be sure positively.
Q: I need to ensure that a particular cpu is not removed when there is some
- work specific to this cpu is in progress.
+ work specific to this cpu in progress.
A: There are two ways. If your code can be run in interrupt context, use
smp_call_function_single(), otherwise use work_on_cpu(). Note that
work_on_cpu() is slow, and can fail due to out of memory:
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists