Message-ID: <20140714201817.GD23791@laptop.dumpdata.com>
Date:	Mon, 14 Jul 2014 16:18:17 -0400
From:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To:	Sander Eikelenboom <linux@...elenboom.it>
Cc:	konrad@...nel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
	boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, david.vrabel@...rix.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4] PCI back fixes for 3.17.

On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:16:18PM +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> 
> Monday, July 14, 2014, 9:54:05 PM, you wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 09:01:29PM +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> >> 
> >> Monday, July 14, 2014, 8:45:47 PM, you wrote:
> >> 
> >> > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 08:24:33PM +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> >> >> 
> >> >> Monday, July 14, 2014, 7:45:25 PM, you wrote:
> >> >> 
> >> >> > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 07:43:04PM +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> Monday, July 14, 2014, 7:37:53 PM, you wrote:
> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> >> Ad B)
> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> >> root@...0:~# xl pci-list router
> >> >> >> >> >> Vdev Device
> >> >> >> >> >> 05.0 0000:00:1b.0
> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> >> root@...0:~# xl pci-assignable-list
> >> >> >> >> >> 0000:02:00.0
> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> >> root@...0:~# xl pci-detach router 00:1b.0
> >> >> >> >> >> dmesg shows:
> >> >> >> >> >> [  199.742668] pciback 0000:00:1b.0: restoring config space at offset 0x10 (was 0x4, writing 0xf7d30004)
> >> >> >> >> >> [  199.743527] pciback 0000:00:1b.0: restoring config space at offset 0xc (was 0x0, writing 0x10)
> >> >> >> >> >> [  199.744321] pciback 0000:00:1b.0: restoring config space at offset 0x4 (was 0x100000, writing 0x100006)
> >> >> >> >> >> [  199.757184] xen-pciback pci-1-0: xen_pcibk_xenbus_remove freeing pdev @ 0xffff8800589fce40
> >> >> >> >> >> [  199.758139] xen-pciback pci-1-0: xen_pcibk_disconnect pdev @ 0xffff8800589fce40
> >> >> >> >> >> [  199.862595] xen: xen_unregister_device_domain_owner
> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> >> xl dmesg shows:
> >> >> >> >> >> (XEN) [2014-07-14 16:28:29] memory_map:remove: dom1 gfn=f3070 mfn=f7d30 nr=4
> >> >> >> >> >> (XEN) [2014-07-14 16:28:29] io.c:322: d1: unbind: m_gsi=22 g_gsi=36 dev=00:00.5 intx=0
> >> >> >> >> >> (XEN) [2014-07-14 16:28:29] io.c:390: d1 unmap: m_irq=22 dev=00:00.5 intx=0
> >> >> >> >> >> (XEN) [2014-07-14 16:28:29] [VT-D]iommu.c:1579: d1:PCIe: unmap 0000:00:1b.0
> >> >> >> >> >> (XEN) [2014-07-14 16:28:29] [VT-D]iommu.c:1440: d0:PCIe: map 0000:00:1b.0
> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> >> root@...0:~# xl pci-list router
> >> >> >> >> >> root@...0:~# xl pci-assignable-list
> >> >> >> >> >> 0000:00:1b.0
> >> >> >> >> >> 0000:02:00.0
> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> >> root@...0:~# xl pci-assignable-remove 00:1b.0
> >> >> >> >> >> dmesg shows:
> >> >> >> >> >> [  318.827415] xen: xen_unregister_device_domain_owner
> >> >> >> >> >> [  318.828771] xen: xen_unregister_device_domain_owner: ENODEV
> >> >> >> >> >> [  318.930869] pciback 0000:00:1b.0: restoring config space at offset 0x10 (was 0x4, writing 0xf7d30004)
> >> >> >> >> >> [  318.933435] pciback 0000:00:1b.0: restoring config space at offset 0xc (was 0x0, writing 0x10)
> >> >> >> >> >> [  318.935877] pciback 0000:00:1b.0: restoring config space at offset 0x4 (was 0x100000, writing 0x100006)
> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> >> root@...0:~# xl pci-list router
> >> >> >> >> >> root@...0:~# xl pci-assignable-list
> >> >> >> >> >> 0000:02:00.0
> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> > And if you do:
> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> > # xl pci-detach router 02:00.0
> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> > Err, I meant
> >> >> >> > # xl pci-assignable-remove 02:00.0
> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> Ah ok .. so that is:
> >> >> >> remove a device from pciback that has never been assigned to any guest .. 
> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> will also give that a go .. although that probably won't be a problem. 
> >> >> 
> >> >> > Right. So I think it all works as expected? That is if you have
> >> >> > two PCI devices assigned to a guest and want to re-use them you
> >> >> > have to do the 'pci-detach' twice and then follow that with
> >> >> >  'pci-assignable-remove' twice as well?
> >> >> 
> >> >> Well except that's not what i want :-) .. that's about the same as shutting down 
> >> >> the guest .. and indeed that works :-)
> >> >> 
> >> >> What i want to do is to remove just *one* device and leave the other one in the guest.
> >> >> 
> >> >> The one that i remove .. i would like to be able to remove it from being 
> >> >> assignable .. (rebind it in dom0) and/or assign it to another guest.
> >> 
> >> > Aha
> >> >> 
> >> >> And that fails because pciback still thinks the guest owns the device ..
> >> >> while libxl thinks it doesn't (outcome of xl pci-assignable-list).
> >> 
> >> > Oh
> >> >> 
> >> >> When doing the:
> >> >> 
> >> >> # xl pci-assignable-list
> >> >> 0000:02:00.0
> >> >> # xl pci-assignable-remove 02:00.0
> >> >> dmesg shows:               
> >> >> [  443.292951] xen: xen_unregister_device_domain_owner
> >> >> [  443.294308] xen: xen_unregister_device_domain_owner: ENODEV
> >> >> [  443.398827] pciback 0000:02:00.0: restoring config space at offset 0x3c (was 0x100, writing 0x104)
> >> >> [  443.400797] pciback 0000:02:00.0: restoring config space at offset 0x10 (was 0x4, writing 0xf7c00004)
> >> >> [  443.401713] pciback 0000:02:00.0: restoring config space at offset 0x4 (was 0x100000, writing 0x100006)
> >> >> 
> >> >> which i think is what is expected ..
> >> 
> >> > Right.
> >> 
> >> >> 
> >> >> 
> >> >> Hmm  /sys/bus/pci/drivers/pciback  doesn't shed much light, because in the state 
> >> >> just after a xl pci-detach, the device is still registred by pciback (from dom0's 
> >> >> view) which is correct, what is wrong is that pciback still seems to think that 
> >> >> it is in turn still owned by the guest. That doesn't get reflected in the info 
> >> >> available in the /sys dir.
> >> 
> >> > Oh
> >> >> 
> >> >> Ok over to xen-store ... 
> >> 
> >> > I think I had a patch for that in libxl. It was the order of operations it was
> >> > doing - it did the 'unbind' first and then it did the XenBus operations.
> >> 
> >> >> 
> >> >> first a diff between the booted guest with two devices passed through and the 
> >> >> state after the "xl pci-detach router 00:1b.0"
> >> >> 
> >> >> root@...anuc:~# diff -U10 xs-before-detach-first.txt xs-after-detach-first.txt
> >> >> --- xs-before-detach-first.txt  2014-07-14 19:56:23.233576000 +0200
> >> >> +++ xs-after-detach-first.txt   2014-07-14 20:00:00.053576000 +0200
> >> >> @@ -185,35 +185,29 @@
> >> >>         feature-rx-flip = "0"
> >> >>         feature-split-event-channels = "1"
> >> >>         multi-queue-max-queues = "4"
> >> >>         hotplug-status = "connected"
> >> >>      pci = ""
> >> >>       1 = ""
> >> >>        0 = ""
> >> >>         frontend = "/local/domain/1/device/pci/0"
> >> >>         frontend-id = "1"
> >> >>         online = "1"
> >> >> -       state = "3"
> >> >> +       state = "7"
> >> >>         domain = "router"
> >> >>         key-0 = "0000:02:00.0"
> >> >>         dev-0 = "0000:02:00.0"
> >> >>         vdevfn-0 = "28"
> >> >>         opts-0 = "msitranslate=0,power_mgmt=0,permissive=0"
> >> >>         state-0 = "3"
> >> >> -       key-1 = "0000:00:1b.0"
> >> >> -       dev-1 = "0000:00:1b.0"
> >> >> -       vdevfn-1 = "30"
> >> >> -       opts-1 = "msitranslate=0,power_mgmt=0,permissive=0"
> >> >> -       state-1 = "3"
> >> >> -       num_devs = "2"
> >> >> +       num_devs = "1"
> >> >>         vdev-0 = "0000:00:00.00"
> >> >> -       vdev-1 = "0000:00:01.00"
> >> >>         root-0 = "0000:00"
> >> >>         root_num = "1"
> >> >>    1 = ""
> >> >>     vm = "/vm/a102d97e-8388-414e-97e5-cc394656c47d"
> >> >>     name = "router"
> >> >>     cpu = ""
> >> >>      0 = ""
> >> >>       availability = "online"
> >> >>      1 = ""
> >> >>       availability = "online"
> >> >> 
> >> >> It seems ok, perhaps apart from the general pci state going from 3 to 7 ?
> >> >> Haven't looked up the exact states, but since only one domain is removes i would 
> >> >> still expect it to be 3 ?
> >> 
> >> > 7 is Reconfiguring which is what it should move to (to update the XenBus).
> >> 
> >> Ok, but that should than be acknowledged somewhere by someone i suppose .. and 
> >> not stay in that state ?
> >> 
> >> >> 
> >> >> 
> >> >> Now a diff before and after the "xl pci-assignable-remove 00:1b.0"
> >> >> diff xs-after-detach-first.txt xs-after-pci-assignable-remove-first.txt is 
> >> >> empty, as expected since this is a pciback only thing now involving any guest.
> >> >> 
> >> >> 
> >> >> And now the last diff, between the state before and after the "xl pci-detach 
> >> >> 02:00.0" removing the last pci device from the guest.
> >> >> 
> >> >> root@...anuc:~# diff -U5 xs-after-pci-assignable-remove-first.txt xs-after-pci-detach-second.txt
> >> >> --- xs-after-pci-assignable-remove-first.txt    2014-07-14 20:00:45.161576000 +0200
> >> >> +++ xs-after-pci-detach-second.txt      2014-07-14 20:01:20.177576000 +0200
> >> >> @@ -184,27 +184,10 @@
> >> >>         feature-rx-copy = "1"
> >> >>         feature-rx-flip = "0"
> >> >>         feature-split-event-channels = "1"
> >> >>         multi-queue-max-queues = "4"
> >> >>         hotplug-status = "connected"
> >> >> -    pci = ""
> >> >> -     1 = ""
> >> >> -      0 = ""
> >> >> -       frontend = "/local/domain/1/device/pci/0"
> >> >> -       frontend-id = "1"
> >> >> -       online = "1"
> >> >> -       state = "7"
> >> >> -       domain = "router"
> >> >> -       key-0 = "0000:02:00.0"
> >> >> -       dev-0 = "0000:02:00.0"
> >> >> -       vdevfn-0 = "28"
> >> >> -       opts-0 = "msitranslate=0,power_mgmt=0,permissive=0"
> >> >> -       state-0 = "3"
> >> >> -       num_devs = "1"
> >> >> -       vdev-0 = "0000:00:00.00"
> >> >> -       root-0 = "0000:00"
> >> >> -       root_num = "1"
> >> >>    1 = ""
> >> >>     vm = "/vm/a102d97e-8388-414e-97e5-cc394656c47d"
> >> >>     name = "router"
> >> >>     cpu = ""
> >> >>      0 = ""
> >> >> @@ -249,15 +232,10 @@
> >> >>        event-channel-rx = "25"
> >> >>        request-rx-copy = "1"
> >> >>        feature-rx-notify = "1"
> >> >>        feature-sg = "1"
> >> >>        feature-gso-tcpv4 = "1"
> >> >> -    pci = ""
> >> >> -     0 = ""
> >> >> -      backend = "/local/domain/0/backend/pci/1/0"
> >> >> -      backend-id = "0"
> >> >> -      state = "1"
> >> >>     control = ""
> >> >>      shutdown = ""
> >> >>      platform-feature-multiprocessor-suspend = "1"
> >> >>      platform-feature-xs_reset_watches = "1"
> >> >>     hvmloader = ""
> >> >> 
> >> >> That seems ok.
> >> >> 
> >> >> So apart from that perhaps incorrect general pci state change, the info in 
> >> >> xenstore seems to be OK.
> >> >> 
> >> >> So it does seem to be a lack of pciback receiving a confirm from libxl / qemu that the 
> >> >> device is indeed removed from the guest for the final deregistring of the 
> >> >> ownership.
> >> >> 
> >> >> Because after a pci-detach the pci device is:
> >> >> - removed from xen-store as attached to the guest
> >> >> - the iommu has assigned/mapped it back to dom0
> >> >> - xl pci-assignable-list shows it as assignable again
> >> >> 
> >> >> So only pciback is the only one left out of the party :-)
> >> >> Couldn't it be somehow tied to the iommu events, since it should be in sync with that i suppose ?
> >> 
> >> 
> >> > Let me find out what is up with this. Once the device
> >> > is de-assigned from a guest (even if forcefully) it should
> >> > be possible to assign it to another.
> >> 
> >> Yes .. at least for the rebinding to dom0 case, because the 
> >> pci-assignable-remove seems to do it forcefully now. But i haven't tried what it 
> >> does when reassigning to another guest (if it forcefully swaps ownership then, 
> >> since the pci-assignable-remove isn't involved then).
> >> 
> >> Will give the xen patch a try.
> 
> > I found out what the problem is. It has been in the code for eons and 
> > I think we never tested for it because the older toolstack (xend) would
> > do things differently.
> 
> That .. and probably not many people testing .. 
> Until now i used the automatic assign and deassign on guest creation
> and shutdown which doesn't exhibit this problem.
> 
> > The issue here is:
> 
> >  1) xl pci-detach <dom-id> <BDF>
> 
> > 'xl' removes the whole device from the XenStore, so from:
> >        domain = "USB"
> 
> >        vdevfn-0 = "28" 
> >        opts-0 = "msitranslate=0,power_mgmt=0,permissive=0"
> >        state-0 = "3"
> >        vdev-0 = "0000:00:00.00"
> >        root-0 = "0000:00"
> >        key-0 = "0000:07:00.0"
> >        dev-0 = "0000:07:00.0"
> 
> >        key-1 = "0000:04:00.0"
> >        dev-1 = "0000:04:00.0"
> >        vdevfn-1 = "30" 
> >        opts-1 = "msitranslate=0,power_mgmt=0,permissive=0"
> >        state-1 = "3"
> >        num_devs = "2"
> >        vdev-1 = "0000:00:01.00"
> >        root_num = "1"
> 
> > it just yanks out the '*-1' values, so we have:
> 
> >        domain = "USB"
> 
> >        vdevfn-0 = "28" 
> >        opts-0 = "msitranslate=0,power_mgmt=0,permissive=0"
> >        state-0 = "3"
> >        vdev-0 = "0000:00:00.00"
> >        root-0 = "0000:00"
> >        key-0 = "0000:07:00.0"
> >        dev-0 = "0000:07:00.0"
> 
> >         num_devs = "1"
> 
> > While if the frontend was PV (so xen-pcifront) it would first but
> > the state-1 to 5 (Closed) which would let the Xen pciback deallocate this.
> 
> > Anyhow, Xen pciback should be able to deal with this, but the patch
> > is going to take a bit of time to figure out.
> 
> > Thank you for reporting it and helping me with the XenStore output to
> > narrow down the culprit!
> 
> The thing i don't understand then is:
> How is it different for the last (or all ) device(s) ?
> (since the last device (or removing all devices) before doing the 
> assignable-remove doesn't trigger the warning)
> 
> Or does the complete removal of the pci-part of the tree in xenstore trigger something ?

Yup. It removes the whole 'pci' directory in XenStore which triggers
in Xen pciback the code to deal with that.

>  
> You know if you got a patch cooked up, i'm more than happy to test !

Hehe!
> 
> --
> Sander
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists