[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140714221414.GA957@ravnborg.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 00:14:14 +0200
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/38] clean-up uapi + asm-generic Kbuild files
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 05:34:59PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 14 July 2014 17:06:09 Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> >
> > What tree is the best for this stuff?
> > I would suggest to go via the asm-generic tree that Arnd has.
> > But it also touches a lot of architectures so Andrews -mm or
> > kbuild#misc could be used.
>
> I rarely have anything to send for the asm-generic tree, usually I
> rely on things getting merged the other way round, through whoever
> has an interest in changing asm-generic.
OK - I will try to channel it through another tree.
If you could fine time to review "[PATCH 38/38] asm-generic: introduc Kbuild.generic"
I would be happy.
The patch itself is simple - but it is more if it really
is relevant. I am not sure how many files from asm-generic that
in reality end up being used by all architectures.
A possibility is to extend this so we can drop a specific file
from a few architectures could be added.
We could for example use this to add preempt.h for all architectures
except x86 that provide a x86 specific version.
But I decided to start simple.
Btw. I should have made this patch separate from the rest.
I just added it on top of the others since it touched the same area.
I will keep it separate in future submissions.
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists