| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CABPqkBSVRuyOH8bTU4pjLNZMZdHoWFB4y-HJzVWTVowrO2Q+tg@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 00:50:27 +0200 From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com> To: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf, x86: Don't mark DataLA addresses as store On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 12:49 AM, Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 12:39 AM, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com> wrote: >>> I have a problem with this patch. >>> >>> It makes: perf mem -t store rec record OP_NA for the store. >>> It was recording OP_STORE before. >>> >>> I think we need to keep LD/ST info. This is useful for analysis >>> especially if we collect loads/stores simultaneously. >>> >>> Was working before for the mem-loads, mem-stores events. >> >> Ok. Would it be enough if it only worked for "mem-stores" and not >> all PEBS events? >> > Ok, do that at a minimum. > But if I recall the PEBS stores events were not that many to begin with. >> Otherwise have to go back to an even larger PEBS constraint >> table for HSW than before. >> >> -Andi >> >> -- >> ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists